View Kristopher Nelson's profile on LinkedIn

About Me

a picture of me I am a PhD student in law and technology (history of science and science studies) at the University of California, San Diego.

Last May, I graduated from law school after studying in Seattle and San Francisco. Formerly, I was a systems analyst, systems administrator, and IT manager for Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center in Seattle. I used to live in New Orleans (I started law school there first), but a certain hurricane chased me out. As a result, and including summers, I've attended five different law schools. As a law student, I focused on intellectual property, disability and employment law, as well as search and seizure issues.

At UCSD, I am currently working on intellectual property, especially copyright; medicine, including vaccination and public health; scientific expertise; and civil rights, especially as related to the Internet and technology.

Constructing a Useful Theory of Knowledge

Gerty Theresa Radnitz Cori (1896-1957) and Carl Ferdinand Cori (1896-1984)Studying law provided me a useful set of materials to think about. To make use of this hard-won experience, throughout this paper I am going to connect Science Studies to the legal world I so recently emerged from.

My point is not to say that any of these theoretical positions or approaches are the correct ones, but rather to explore the utility of forcing them to serve different ends. This is emblematic of how I approach theories: Not as the end of the inquiry, but rather as tools that can be used on many different kinds of materials.

Through unanticipated uses, both the tool and the material can be (to mix metaphors) illuminated in unique and interesting ways. Theory is not about finding final explanations, but rather about opening up new lines of inquiry and suggesting different approaches to problems. Theory must be applied to be useful, and usefulness is a theme of "Constructing a Useful Theory of Knowledge."

 

Transnational Wiretaps and the 4th Amendment

The Fourth Amendment protects Americans within the borders of the United States, but its applicability outside American territory is less clear. I maintain that Fourth Amendment protections should cover wiretap evidence seized abroad, not just that gathered domestically. These protections should apply whenever a prosecutor seeks to admit such evidence in criminal prosecutions in the United States. Such protections are fundamental whenever the government acts to gather or use evidence, whether that evidence was obtained outside the territorial jurisdiction of the United States or not.

The practical application of these protections for evidence gathered abroad presents problems, however. For example, can the U.S. exercise any control over the methods used to gather evidence by foreign police agencies? Does the exclusionary rule, meant to inculcate a respect for the Fourth Amendment in domestic officials, have any positive role to play in impacting the behavior of non-U.S. agents? Should we judge admissibility based on another countries laws or should we insist our laws should apply abroad as well? Does it matter if the U.S. initiated the wiretap, or if the foreign country provided the information without direction from the United States? All of these are potentially difficult questions in the context of evidence gathered abroad for use in this country.

continue reading

Open Source, Open Access, and Open Transfer

One of the most hotly contested issues in the field of intellectual property law concerns the existence, or non-existence, of patent thickets and the extent to which any such bottlenecks may be interfering with research. For decades, scholars warned that problems related to the over proliferation of patent rights would interfere with innovation. In contrast, a growing body of commentary argues that patent thickets are not a problem in modern industries. Either patent thickets do not exist, or if they do, patent thickets do not interfere with the progress of research.

The rhetoric is particularly heated these days because of dramatic changes underway in patent law. Research bottlenecks, or lack thereof, are invoked either in support of or in opposition to such changes, and it is difficult to have a rational discussion when so much seems to be at stake.

Stepping back from the rhetoric a bit, this piece suggests that one can sometimes indirectly observe effects, even if one cannot directly measure the extent of a phenomenon. With this in mind, the piece describes three approaches appearing in modern patent markets that are directed at mitigating the effects of patent thickets. These approaches can be described as Open Source, Open Access, and Open Transfer. From our vantage point, we may not be able to see or to measure the depth of the thicket. We can, however, observe the altered growth patterns that give us some indication of where the problems lie.

continue reading

My Updates

    follow me
    on Twitter

    My Comments

    You do not get an "A for effort" with copyright

    A quick quote: "The goal of copy right is not to reward creators for their efforts. Copyright does not come into being because authors labor over their novels. Instead, the point is to create an incentive to create, while leaving open the eventual public benefit."

    Read more comments by Kristopher Nelson

    Packrati.us: A Dead Simple Way To Make Delicious Bookmark The Links You Tweet

    I was just looking for something to do this today, strangely enough! Tweecious does this, too, if people want another choice. It's a Firefox Extension, so you have to have Firefox running to do the processing. Tweecious uses Zemanta's API to provide useful (if imperfect) tags automatically, so you get something basic at least. It works pretty well.

    Read more comments by Kristopher Nelson

    Featured Posts RSS Feed

    Are universities about selling information?

    I don't believe universities (in their best form, at least) are easily replicated by technological means of information dissemination. But despite the advantages their physicality and tradition offers, many universities have tended to see themselves as simply the means to fill students up with information, stick an "approved" stamp on them, and send them out into the world.

    continue reading

    Is scientific peer review censorship?

    Does scientific peer review constitute censorship? There is a sense in which peer reviewers -- especially in the sciences -- do act in a kind of censorial capacity.

    continue reading

    Yelp sued, argues lawsuit is without merit

    Yelp was recently sued in federal district court in Los Angeles for "extortion." The plaintiffs say Yelp salespeople demanded monthly payments in exchange for removing or toning down negative reviews. The plaintiffs say Yelp has violated California's unfair competition law.

    continue reading

    Are books -- electronic or not -- becoming "fringe media"?

    Kevin Kelleher of GigaOM believes that "books are becoming a fringe media." I say: true for non-fiction, not so much for fiction.

    continue reading

    Six more of the best WordPress plugins

    I admit it. I'm a WordPress plugin junkie. I'm continually updating, adding, removing, and adjusting the list of plugins I have running this site. Here are six of my current favorites.

    continue reading

    Quote

    "It is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is."

    - Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 137, 177 (1803).